<- Older :: Newer ->

Posts Tagged "design"

13 Oct 2007

The glossy Slovenian blogs

Tags: ,

I’m always happy to add another project to the portfolio. This time it’s Slovenski blogi, or “Slovenian blogs”. I don’t know how you call this type of a website… Blogosphere maybe. It’s a colletion of blogs by Slovene authors, but not necessarily in Slovene language. Most of them are, though. Babble.

I was asked by Robert to do a simple design for the page. He planned to keep at least the basic structure, and after seeing the old design, I decided to keep the color scheme as well ;) The main thing that bothered me with the old design was the complexity of it. It was full of features, but all of them were kind of hidden behind illogical icons (or at least they were to me). So I did my best to simplify it. In the good ol’ “what would Apple do to make it intuitive” spirit.

Robert was quite happy with my design and was quite eager to finish the redesign as soon as possible. I think he had had quite a few sleepless nights during the past 2 weeks, but by this morning, he was done and the site went live.

SloBlogi.net - Slovenski Blogi

I’m really happy with how the site turned out. I hope you like it. And sorry about the orange…

2 Comments

29 Aug 2007

Zemanta enhances your content

Tags: ,

I’ve been quite busy with various things lately, hence no blog updates. Sorry for that. But I do have something to show.

I’m working on a website design for a freshly-opened Slovene company, called Zemanta. They were in a hurry and therefore aired a demo website a bit ahead of schedule. Click here for the page.

They had the idea of showing users a demo of what they can do - a content enhancement system. We discussed a bit, drew a few paper demos (as thought by user interface expert Jure Čuhalev) and then I did the actual design. They liked it and made it work.

The demo currently takes any paragraph of text and “enhances it” with some fancy links, keywords and an image. Currently it’s Slovene only. But English speaking users can just use the prepared paragraph, click GO and look at the pretty animation ;)

I hope you like the design. And sorry about the orange…

No Comments

13 Jul 2007

Fixed width vs. fluid

Tags: ,

At the very beginning of laying out a website, we are presented with two choices. Shall we make the design fixed width, or fluid? For those not familiar with the terminology, fixed width is this and fluid is this. The first has a fixed width regardless of the browser window and the second stretches as browser window gets wider. Try resizing your window to see what I’m talking about.

Fixed width layouts look fine in your average-sized browser window, but there are two extremes to consider. On really narrow windows (cell phone browsers for example), one might get a horizontal scroller, which nobody is really fond of. It makes reading a website a real pain, especially when text itself is wider that the window. And when it comes to really wide browser windows (wide-screen 24″ monitors are just sexy), the layout’s background is stretched far left and far right. Usually this results in large white areas to the left and right. And I’ve had people going “I spent all that money on my display and now I can’t benefit from it”.

On the other hand, fluid layouts look fine in your average-sized browser window, but we have to consider two extremes (oh the irony). In really narrow windows they usually get very useless with each word of the text falling in a new line, objects overlapping, etc. And how would you like reading text stretched all the way from the far left of your new 30″ display (let’s not be modest with the 24″) to the far right. I’m sure your neck wouldn’t like that.

For some theory - Long time ago, people have realized that line length does matter in printed material. Short lines require most of our times jumping from one line to the next, which, I know it mind sound funny, but is time consuming and requires some concentration. And when lines get longer, reading requires much moving of the neck and finding the next line gets a bit tricky. So it was agreed that the length of the lines (or width of the text block) must fall within some optimal limits. And it’s no different with web sites. Ideal length of a line on the web is said to be about 30 to 35 em, where 1 em is “equal to the pt size of the current font”. So, with 12px fonts, 1em is 12px. Why am I talking about typography and text layout all of a sudden? Because with most web pages, text is the central part of the site, and therefore plays a big role in our original question.

Ideally, I would recommend using fluid-width layouts, but don’t let them get too wide or too narrow. CSS min-width and max-width rules come in very handy here. Problem is, guys at Microsoft don’t agree. I’m not sure about IE7, but IE6 just ignores the two, which makes them useless, really… So I usually go for a fixed width design, due to the points I described in the previous paragraph. It’s just way more readable. I usually make text lines a bit longer than the ideal 30-35em though, but compensate that with a bigger line-height, which improves readability. I also tend to make designs fit 800×600 resolution. There are still people using it, as well as people who are not so fond of full-screen browser windows. I still can’t understand how one buys a 24″ display to run everything full-screen on it. Multiple windows side-by-side, anyone? I don’t think there are many applications that would benefit from so much space, but having more windows displayed on the screen can be quite nice. So for people “not benefiting from their big 24 inch display”, try this. Websites are a bit narrow so you can use the screen space for something else, not so you can complain about the white space.

Fixed width layout comes with another question - where to align the content? Left, center, or right. Believe me on this one, but you don’t want to use right if your language uses a left to right writing system. I do think that designs aligned to the left usually look very nice (example), but I don’t recommend them since the problem of large white areas is even bigger here. And usually we look at the center of our display, rather than to the far left edge. So a centrally positioned fixed-width layout would be my choice. But I do think fluid layouts can be very nice when done properly. Just don’t let the text boxes get too wide. For a good example of such a layout, see Web Standards Project. Looks nice and reads very well on different browser sizes.

2 Comments

08 Jul 2007

How to liven up a website

Tags: ,

About a year ago I was asked to make a website for a primary school. No money was involved in the project, but I did my best to come up with a cute design. So this is what I showed them: OŠ Valentina Vodnika, as I saw it

I was quite happy with the design and so were the school guys… for a while. They did use my htmls and I explained a few things to them on how to add new content. So they learned some html basics. And since the design was very dull and given the fact this is a primary school, they decided to liven it up. So they got rid of the plain white background and added butterflies to it. And of course, the design itself needed more color. Red maybe.. and blue and another shade of green. But still the design was so static. So why not add some animation? Of course! And some caps to make the important data stand out more. And that green boy on green background… What’s that all about? Let’s just put something more interesting there. So that was the looks, but they had more up their sleeve. They played with the navigation, making it more dynamic. And the final touch, the most important of them all, oh yes, the counter. Voila. Much better. So here’s the result: OŠ Valentina Vodnika, v2.0, the lively version.

I didn’t take the time to congratulate them yet, but I did change the link in the portfolio, for I don’t like taking credit for someone else’s work.

5 Comments